Vitalik Offers Tantalizing Glimpse of His Wealth in ETH


Vitalik Buterin is rich in ETH

It’s no surprise that Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin has haters, it’s how he responds to them that makes him a class act. NYU economist Nouriel Roubini is well known for his analysis of conventional markets, but the experienced analyst is not always measured (or informed) in his criticisms of cryptocurrency. In a recent screed, Roubini accused Vitalik Buterin of being a scammer…and a billionaire. Neither point had the virtue of being true, but Vitalik was still gracious and concise in his response to both.

Is Vitalik Buterin a Billionaire?

Vitalik is not and never was a billionaire. In Ethereum’s (ETH) early days, Buterin owned about 0.9% of the entire ETH supply. As ETH grew in value, Buterin sold much of his position to fund development (and whatever else he wished to spend it on, we suppose). When you could buy ETH at $1,250 last year, Forbes pegged his wealth at somewhere between $400 and $500 million. That’s a fair amount of the way to “the three commas club”, but still well short of Nouriel Roubini’s accusation.

There are two Ethereum addresses that are known to belong to Vitalik Buterin:

  1. 0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B
  2. 0x1db3439a222c519ab44bb1144fc28167b4fa6ee6

You can check the contents of these addresses yourself at At the time of this writing, the first contains 365,003 ETH and the second 4,968. This puts Buterin’s total fiat-equivalent wealth at somewhere near $72,500,000 – still wealthy by any standards, but miles away from billionaire status.

Is Vitalik Buterin a Scammer?

Vitalik Buterin Billionaire? Scammer?
Vitalik Buterin isn’t a billionaire…yet

Clearly, if Vitalik Buterin wishes to be a billionaire, he’s doing something wrong. But what about Roubini’s other indictment? Is Vitalik a scammer?

Apparently not. Ethereum is a widely-used blockchain protocol, with clients including the Canadian national government, Microsoft, and BP. If a fintech company like Ethereum advertises services, and then provides them, at what point is the market being scammed?

However, Rouhini doesn’t seem to address Ethereum as a technology. He has its very nature as a cryptocurrency in his sights. The economist claimed on Twitter that in pre-mining much of the Ether supply (75%, says Rouhini), Buterin and Joe Lubin became instant billionaires. We’ve already addressed the billionaire bit, so let’s take a look at how Vitalik addresses the accusation that pre-mining is inherently scammy.

From Twitter: “I’m pretty sure there are no criminal laws against pre-mining” and later “The Ethereum Foundation only ever owned ~3m, and now has ~660k; the rest was spent on development.”

Another Old-School Economist Doesn’t Understand

Cryptocurrency is not a perfect financial system, and blockchain should be open to criticism, especially from experts from other industries. However, expertise is not what Nouriel Roubini offers in this case. His criticisms of Vitalik Buterin, and blockchain technology itself, betrays an embarrassingly primitive comprehension of these issues.

Roubini obviously didn’t even understand enough to be able to check Buterin’s publicly available holdings, or to place Ethereum’s origin story within the context of the blockchain industry at large.

Vitalik Buterin envisaged Ethereum as a transparent financial technology, one where the abuses we’ve grown accustomed to in the conventional finance industry would not be possible. This event goes to show that he’s still well on his way to accomplishing these goals. This Twitter event also proves that Ethereum has been using its ETH holdings for their intended purpose all along! Having greatly depleted the Ethereum Foundation war chest, Buterin proves just how much money has been spent on Ethereum research and development.

Vitalik Buterin may not be a billionaire, but these events prove that he’s acting with the purpose and confidence of someone who may reach that financial milestone someday.

Leave a Reply

Notify of

Risk Warning: Investing in digital currencies, stocks, shares and other securities, commodities, currencies and other derivative investment products (e.g. contracts for difference (“CFDs”) is speculative and carries a high level of risk. Each investment is unique and involves unique risks.

CFDs and other derivatives are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how an investment works and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Cryptocurrencies can fluctuate widely in prices and are, therefore, not appropriate for all investors. Trading cryptocurrencies is not supervised by any EU regulatory framework. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Any trading history presented is less than 5 years old unless otherwise stated and may not suffice as a basis for investment decisions. Your capital is at risk.

When trading in stocks your capital is at risk.

Past performance is not an indication of future results. Trading history presented is less than 5 years old unless otherwise stated and may not suffice as a basis for investment decisions. Prices may go down as well as up, prices can fluctuate widely, you may be exposed to currency exchange rate fluctuations and you may lose all of or more than the amount you invest. Investing is not suitable for everyone; ensure that you have fully understood the risks and legalities involved. If you are unsure, seek independent financial, legal, tax and/or accounting advice. This website does not provide investment, financial, legal, tax or accounting advice. Some links are affiliate links. For more information please read our full risk warning and disclaimer.